Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

Bitcoin, Ether Are Not Securities, Says Belgium’s Financial Regulator

Share

Belgium’s financial regulator, the Financial Services and Markets Authority (FSMA), has clarified its position on the status of cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin and Ether, stating that crypto assets without an issuer are issued solely by computer code, do not constitute securities. The Belgian government’s position is that cryptocurrencies are more similar to commodities, and thus should not be subject to the same regulations as securities. The clarification comes amid an increase in demands for answers as to how Belgium’s existing financial laws and regulations apply to digital assets, according to the FSMA.

“If there is no issuer, as in cases where instruments are created by a computer code and this is not done in execution of an agreement between issuer and investor (for example, Bitcoin or Ether), then in principle the Prospectus Regulation, the Prospectus Law and the MiFID rules of conduct do not apply,” the FSMA provided the rationale in a report released on November 22.

Furthermore, the Authority also stated that, “Nevertheless, if the instruments have a payment or exchange function, other regulations may apply to the instruments or the persons who provide certain services relating to those instruments.”

In addition, FSMA stressed that their stepwise plan is technology-agnostic, implying that it makes no difference whether digital assets exist and are supported via blockchain or by more conventional ways.

The FSMA originally developed the report in July 2022 in order to respond to commonly asked questions from Belgian digital asset issuers and service providers.

The European Parliament’s Markets in Crypto Assets Regulation (MiCA) is anticipated to go into force at the beginning of 2024, and FSMA claimed that the stepwise plan will serve as a guide until then.

The ruling provides much-needed guidance on how digital assets will be treated under Belgian law. It is hoped that this ruling will paved the way for greater clarity and certainty in other jurisdictions when it comes to the regulatory treatment of digital assets.


Affiliate links may be automatically generated – see our ethics statement for details.